1 hour videos for $10 by health professionals

BETA
Life Learning Blog
29Oct
BY Life Learning Team
EssayHelpForHire

If the source has indestructible positive and negative property (even in atom), does it not its projection, call it gravitational field, inherit such property?

Therefore, such projected field inherits its quality, has the quality of its source. Is the suggested beam experiment to NASA beneficial? It is, it will be for the progress of science.!! This is a new experiment from OUTSIDE earth gravitational field!!!

Reiterating, the extra-territorial beam experiment could further affirm the constant speed of light and/or further show how deeper gravitational field could have effect on speed of light. The wavelength of the light will change, but the speed will not. It wouldn’t be to our benefit. Back and froth compensates for each other.

Such new concept appears unacceptable now….What is electro-magnetism? Here is something new: it is the friction of magnetism, rubbing against one another that activates it, call it, electro-MAGNETISM. .jsaldea12 This is just bizarre.Did you forget your medication ? Where does it come from? What is its source? Is it not that such gravitational field emanates, a projection, from such mentioned suspended bodies.

Originally Posted by jsaldea12 This is a new experiment from OUTSIDE earth gravitational field!!! The Earth’s gravitational field has an infinite range. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 Reiterating, with this new experiment in gravitational field in deeper space, Saturn, will further support the constant speed of light Unnecessary. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 But continue ask yourself, where does the gravitational field came from?

Where do magnetic fields come from? Electric fields? It’s the same question, and it’s equally irrelevant and unanswerable. “Why” something is, is not scientific but philosophical – in science we determine what is the case, rather than the reason for it.And approaching things scientifically, there is no reason to assume that gravitational and electromagnetic forces are one and the same. Where does it come from?

What is its source? Is it not that such gravitational field emanates, a projection, from such mentioned suspended bodies. Reiterating, it cannot succeed.It takes a lot of time and analysis to realize what is this gravitational field of such bodies as earth, stars, galaxies that completely occupy all of outer space and even interior of atoms. If there’s no good reason to do it, therefore, we shouldn’t do it. It is still intriguing why, with due respect, to NASA, such experiment has not been attempted or if attempted, it would be to our benefit.

Originally Posted by jsaldea12 Moving light? Light moves in all direction and in case of Cassini, the beam from earth is specifically designed, directed toward Cassini, besides, motion of Cassini can be taken into consideration in the measurement. What they can affect, is the percieved distance bewteen two points, but from the distance traveled and the time taken, you will always calculate the light as moving at c (unless, of course, it passes through gas or other material en-route). To meassure or calculate a distance you have to determin and agree on a unity for reference first but also on how to determin it.For time in fysics the second is determined by a natural frecquency (atomic clock).Therefor and because of the subjekt it,s logic (and done also) to use a specific wavelength for the unity of distance and maybe even from the same source. Originally Posted by Ghrasp In case of isaldea,s ideas C does not have to be constant in all direction.

This experiment would take up a significant amount of time, from a probe that cost millions of dollars to launch and has a finite lifetime. Any good experiment will have re-runs, and re-re-runs. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 or it will also show just how gravitational field can affect light. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 and/or further show how deeper gravitational field could have effect on speed of light. Why can’t it?

The existance of magnetic monopoles is predicted by an otherwise very successful theory, why should they be unable to exist? Originally Posted by jsaldea12 It takes where can i buy a essay
a lot of time and analysis to realize what is this gravitational field of such bodies as earth, stars, galaxies that completely occupy all of outer space and even interior of atoms. The speed of light is not in doubt, and this experiment would not improve the accuracy of the figure we already have. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 It is still intriguing why, with due respect, to NASA, such experiment has not been attempted or if attempted, it would be to our benefit.

If the source has such indestructible positive and negative property, then the projected aura (gravitational field) also has such quality. Reiterating, with this new experiment in gravitational field in deeper space, Saturn, will further support the constant speed of light or it will also show just how gravitational field can affect light.I believe the whole scientific community has been trying to capture magnetic monopole, even in the LHC. If the source has such indestructible positive and negative property, then the projected aura (gravitational field) also has such quality.

But such experiments (or practical uses) can’t be used to proof that the wind does not have influence then. As for experimental proof against this most cases I know of the signal direction is two ways back and forth with a reflection in between. Nope. If the source has such indestructible positive and negative property, then the projected aura (gravitational field) also has such quality. We can calculate the amount of deflection and red-shifting and so on, using equations from general relativity – a theory which is in itself incredibly well supported by a range of different experiments.

Therefore, such projected field inherits its quality, has the quality of its source. As you mention the wavelength will change thus every wavelength will, also the one the meter is determined by, the unity. But a wave length implies a direction thus a direction in a gravitational sense also. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 I believe the whole scientific community has been trying to capture magnetic monopole, even in the LHC. Like for a biking trip starting from the same point as ending energywise it makes no difference if the wind influences the speed/energy of the biker.

Which, of course, we already know, and can observe in circumstances where the effects are great enough to be measurable. The difference for both directions is automatically ruled out then and become insignificant for the results of the experiment. The speed of light http://school-collection.edu.ru/ is already known to far greater accuracy than this experiment could possibly measure, and the relativistic effects would be too small to measure.

Oh, an entirely new phenomenon? Well, that being the case, surely you can show me experimental evidence where this new force is at work? And surely you can show me experimental evidence that friction generates magnetism?If you are going to make a scientific claim, you have to be ready to support it. Abstract and meaningless. Therefore, such projected field inherits its quality, has the quality of its source.

The unity is susceptive for direction in a gravitational field then.A ruler (length) or standard meter it will make no diifference if you turn it around 180 degrees or whatever…it stays the same ruler with a specific length as an objekt it,s symmetric and reading cm,s from zero to hundred or vice versa (mirrored) makes no difference.. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 Reiterating, the extra-territorial beam experiment could further affirm the constant speed of light Which is not a useful thing to do. The speed of light in a vacuum has been determined to a greater precision by numerous, more accurate experiments.

The wavelength of the light will change, but the speed will not. But continue ask yourself, where does the gravitational field came from? What is the source? Is it not that gravitational field the projection of earth, stars, etc. in space.

They act on different properties of objects, operate on vastly different scales of magnitude, and follow entirely different laws.As I said before, your extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence – which you have not provided. Nope. Thus, as such, is it not that gravitational field has inherently the same property as its source?An apple bears a fruit, it is an apple, plant the seed, it grows up an apple.Jsaldea12 Jsaldea12.Jsaldea1212.1/10.. j Oh, and the experiment wouldn’t actually work… Where does it come from? What is its source?

Is it not that such gravitational field emanates, a projection, from such mentioned suspended bodies. You can’t be outside the Earth’s gravitational field and still be in the universe. Such new concept appears unacceptable now…. From a black hole C will be decreased but towards the blackhole it will be increased just as much.

Reiterating, with this new experiment in gravitational field in deeper space, Saturn, will further support the constant speed of light or it will also show just how gravitational field can affect light.I believe the whole scientific community has been trying to capture magnetic monopole, even in the LHC. Such immaterial movements of Saturn and also movement of Earth can be easily considered in the measurement of the light speed in comparison with physical astronomical telescope measurement. Reiterating, it cannot succeed. Such new concept appears unacceptable now….What is electro-magnetism? Here is something new: it is the friction of magnetism, rubbing against one another that activates it, call it, electro-MAGNETISM. .jsaldea12 Originally Posted by jsaldea12 The experiment will work: Saturn could be moving at 8 miles, more or less per sec., thus, even in 2 hours travel and change of location, Saturn would still be in immaterial 56,800 miles new location by the time a beam transmitted from earth reaches Cassini in Saturn, and then to transmit back automatically to earth.

Originally Posted by jsaldea12 I am sure, it will not cost much to send that beam. Such immaterial movements of Saturn and also movement of Earth can be easily considered in the measurement of the light speed in comparison with physical astronomical telescope measurement.Also, no matter how predicted and/or theoretically proven: science can never find a magnetic monopole. (pls. refer to the other posting: What is the unified field theory) Just keep on analysing: where does gravitational field comes from, what is the source? If the source has indestructible positive and negative property (even in atom), does it not its projection, call it gravitational field, inherit such property? even though gravitational field is awesomely universal. Originally Posted by jsaldea12 What is electro-magnetism? Here is something new: it is the friction of magnetism, rubbing against one another that activates it, call it, electro-MAGNETISM. . From a black hole C will be decreased but towards the blackhole it will be increased just as much.This can still be independant for all observers it just means C locally is related to the local field of gravity and direction with a difference for both directions.

Reiterating, it cannot succeed.It takes a lot of time and analysis to realize what is this gravitational field of such bodies as earth, stars, galaxies that completely occupy all of outer space and even interior of atoms. Ghrasp, I have no idea what you’re trying to say. I am sure, it will not cost much to send that beam. There would be no reason to “show” this. Yes, it is quite bizarre, at first.

Originally Posted by jsaldea12 Is the suggested beam experiment to NASA beneficial? It is, it will be for the progress of science.!! I’m quite sure you’re not actually reading/understanding my posts any more… In case of isaldea,s ideas C does not have to be constant in all direction.

The experiment will work: Saturn could be moving at 8 miles, more or less per sec., thus, even in 2 hours travel and change of location, Saturn would still be in immaterial 56,800 miles new location by the time a beam transmitted from earth reaches Cassini in Saturn, and then to transmit back automatically to earth.


There is no comment to show.


LEAVE A COMMENT

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New Courses

  • Diabetes: Mind Body Medicine Solutions

  • Chronic Pain: Mind Body Medicine Solutions

  • Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mind Body Medicine Solutions

Our promise to you

1. To be of the highest quality education on health conditions and lifestyle changes to improve your life.

2. To be objective in everything we provide.

3. To have neurology as the basis for better understanding of disease and health complications and what can be done to improve them and their quality of life.